Culver’s is so much better! INO is really just mostly hype in a bun … their burgers are a step above McD’s & BK but not as good as Culver’s. 😊
MaNemSoup
Haven’t had ino, Culver’s slaps tho, I do wish Culver’s had a burger sauce but it doesn’t need it tbh
Ckn-bns-jns
Loved Culver’s when I had it on a trip to Utah. Both places are great IMO.
tryagainagainn
No, it’s gross. Under seasoned. Too much grease. No flavor
kevinmattress
I’m born and raised in California, and I still live here. I eat In Out regularly…. But Culver’s is better 🤫
Riverjig
No.
StonesFan1
No, in my opinion, for the simple fact there aren’t enough of them around the entire Midwest. Their food is fantastic but they are mainly concentrated in WI, MI and FL. A bunch of states have a handful each, but not enough to be considered like INO out west. I linked a map of locations so you can see the disbursement.
If I’m thinking of a regional, fast assembly style burger closest to In N Out for the Midwest it’s probably Steak n Shake, and it’s better, IMO.
Jealous_Airline_919
Culver’s are inconsistent and can be very good, better than INO but most of the time are not so good.
Fun_Intention9846
A lot more money but it’s better food.
Xopao
Just tried it today. Patty is so dry. Bun is far from the buttery taste. So much for your guys’ hype.
Tho onion rings are legit.
Overall. Not worth it. Habit is 💯 better.
UnlimitedDeep
The what of the where
DomesticatedLegend
Culver’s is light years ahead of INO
HeyThereMrBrooks
The fries go crazy. And it’s not a bad burger. But for how much it is I don’t really feel like I get my money’s worth.
I’ll always sing their praises for their buffalo chicken tenders. Actually hot and spicy
robotcoke
Culver’s is way better than In-n-Out. We have both here in Salt Lake so it’s not like I have to judge based on an old memory. Culver’s is much better. In-n-Out is cheaper though.
East-Fix2620
Culver’s actually has good fries
dreadytodie
More like the Braum’s of the Midwest. Love Culver’s tho
scurvyderp
So much hype but Culver’s in Phoenix is very underwhelming. Gotta try a Midwest location before I write it off completely.
TheKingInTheNorth
Culver’s target audience wants all the grease and doesn’t care about veggies. And when you think of it that way, it’s a good comparison between the west coast and midwest cuisines too. It’s a great burger.
But it just can’t even attempt to compare to in n out when it comes to a well rounded cheeseburger that includes lettuce, tomato, onions, and those glorious (grilled and chopped) chiles.
duffduffxx
I eat both regularly. Both are awesome. In n out is better overall
MustardTiger231
Culver’s is superior but InO is probably a better value.
Chuyin84
How dare you compare that sadness with In n Out… not even close
Taintraker
Culver’s > In-n-Out
Disastrous_Life_3612
Culver’s has expanded far beyond the Midwest. They have been making an active effort to become a nationwide brand. In-N-Out stubbornly refuses to expand east of Texas.
pritikina
Damn that looks good. I need to try them again. There’s only one where I live and it’s a drive.
TSissingPhoto
Are the Culver’s in the Midwest worse than elsewhere? I’ve only had it there and Arizona and those ones aren’t that great. In N Out is at least better for flavor and texture.
asimplerandom
Culver’s sucks. I’m gonna get downvoted to hell for this take but the one where I live is a half step above McDonald’s. I don’t get the hype in this sub at all.
tactical_narcotic
Both are amazing but two different beasts. INO has a simple menu with a handful of items where as Culver’s has chicken sandwiches, frozen custards, limited time items. So it’s really hard to compare the teo
zildjen
In Detroit it’s all about them butter burgers & concrete mixers, lol
36 Comments
Culver’s is so much better! INO is really just mostly hype in a bun … their burgers are a step above McD’s & BK but not as good as Culver’s. 😊
Haven’t had ino, Culver’s slaps tho, I do wish Culver’s had a burger sauce but it doesn’t need it tbh
Loved Culver’s when I had it on a trip to Utah. Both places are great IMO.
No, it’s gross. Under seasoned. Too much grease. No flavor
I’m born and raised in California, and I still live here. I eat In Out regularly…. But Culver’s is better 🤫
No.
No, in my opinion, for the simple fact there aren’t enough of them around the entire Midwest. Their food is fantastic but they are mainly concentrated in WI, MI and FL. A bunch of states have a handful each, but not enough to be considered like INO out west. I linked a map of locations so you can see the disbursement.
[Culver’s locations](https://www.scrapehero.com/location-reports/Culver's-USA/)
No, it’s better.
If I’m thinking of a regional, fast assembly style burger closest to In N Out for the Midwest it’s probably Steak n Shake, and it’s better, IMO.
Culver’s are inconsistent and can be very good, better than INO but most of the time are not so good.
A lot more money but it’s better food.
Just tried it today. Patty is so dry. Bun is far from the buttery taste. So much for your guys’ hype.
Tho onion rings are legit.
Overall. Not worth it. Habit is 💯 better.
The what of the where
Culver’s is light years ahead of INO
The fries go crazy. And it’s not a bad burger. But for how much it is I don’t really feel like I get my money’s worth.
I’ll always sing their praises for their buffalo chicken tenders. Actually hot and spicy
Culver’s is way better than In-n-Out. We have both here in Salt Lake so it’s not like I have to judge based on an old memory. Culver’s is much better. In-n-Out is cheaper though.
Culver’s actually has good fries
More like the Braum’s of the Midwest. Love Culver’s tho
So much hype but Culver’s in Phoenix is very underwhelming. Gotta try a Midwest location before I write it off completely.
Culver’s target audience wants all the grease and doesn’t care about veggies. And when you think of it that way, it’s a good comparison between the west coast and midwest cuisines too. It’s a great burger.
But it just can’t even attempt to compare to in n out when it comes to a well rounded cheeseburger that includes lettuce, tomato, onions, and those glorious (grilled and chopped) chiles.
I eat both regularly. Both are awesome. In n out is better overall
Culver’s is superior but InO is probably a better value.
How dare you compare that sadness with In n Out… not even close
Culver’s > In-n-Out
Culver’s has expanded far beyond the Midwest. They have been making an active effort to become a nationwide brand. In-N-Out stubbornly refuses to expand east of Texas.
Damn that looks good. I need to try them again. There’s only one where I live and it’s a drive.
Are the Culver’s in the Midwest worse than elsewhere? I’ve only had it there and Arizona and those ones aren’t that great. In N Out is at least better for flavor and texture.
Culver’s sucks. I’m gonna get downvoted to hell for this take but the one where I live is a half step above McDonald’s. I don’t get the hype in this sub at all.
Both are amazing but two different beasts. INO has a simple menu with a handful of items where as Culver’s has chicken sandwiches, frozen custards, limited time items. So it’s really hard to compare the teo
In Detroit it’s all about them butter burgers & concrete mixers, lol
I think Culver’s is better. Just my 2 cents.
Culvers is God tier.
Ino is trash
Nahh INO wishes it could be like Culver’s
No. Culver’s is 10x better.
Never had bad Culver’s